data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f25fd/f25fdf74340aeecf7cb16e20dded8fac70ac386c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12f85/12f852eb2a4447541130fa21195bd7a35da652b6" alt=""
What does this say? Well on the surface it looks bad — although not particularly newsworthy. But on closer inspection, two things strike me:
- Of course, these folk who are already downloading music are unlikely to come out and say they consider themselves felons. If they did care about copyright, then what are they doing downloading music? So I think the figures are a bit misleading.
- I suspect that, all the bluster aside, the number of people downloading music is going to drop off dramatically now the RIAA is getting heavy. Not the result I think should happen, but it’s inevitable. The Net is a mysterious place and most folk (including me) don’t really know what information can be gleaned about their browsing habits, so better safe than sorry. Whether that’s going to have the intended effect of shuffling everyone off to the mall to stock up on CDs is another matter. One likely outcome is small localized clusters of CD-MP3 sharers along the lines of old mixtapes and CD-borrowing. Not that I’m condoning piracy, oh no sireee. But, now the party’s over, who’s going to go back to buying overpriced CDs just for a couple of songs you like? Share your thoughts.